AI and ML in Anti-Money Laundering
When AI is used as part of a company’s anti-money laundering programme, it refers to a set of algorithms. These algorithms govern the digital measures to identify money laundering & other crimes. These algorithms evaluate massive quantities of client data.
The data includes CDD, sanctions screening, and transaction monitoring inputs. The data is used to execute a range of automated activities to detect questionable behavior.
AML systems can become even more efficient if Machine Learning is used in an AI architecture. Machine learning technologies can measure new client behavior. ML provides a more accurate estimate of the amount of money laundering risk that any client represents.
ML uses previous CDD and transaction monitoring data.
The clients’ transaction data gets entered into an AML programme. The machine learning models check their behavior. It then makes future predictions and judgments about them.
With the use of machine learning, an AML system can become sensitive to tiny changes in behavior. The traditional AML checks usually overlook these tiny changes.
CDD and KYC procedures get completed faster with more depth and scope using AI solutions. Compliance officers will have access to a wider range of relevant AML data. This data drives risk assessments, suspicious activity reports, and investigations. In further detail, AI’s CDD and KYC applications will enable businesses to:
• Collect and identify data from a wider range of external sources. Use of sanctions lists and watch lists help build a more accurate client risk profile.
• Identify beneficial owners of client entities faster.
• Reduce duplication and mistakes. It would improve the consistency of AML measures amongst customers. There is an aggregation and reconciliation of customer data across internal systems.
• Add pertinent data from client risk profiles, external sources to suspicious activity reports.
AML compliance necessitates the examination of unstructured data. It is part of transaction monitoring, PEP, sanctions screening, and other processes. Firms must examine a variety of external sources. These include media and public archives, social networks, and other relevant statistics.
AI solutions assist businesses in managing and analyzing unstructured data. This helps to improve AML compliance. In practice, this involves searching enormous amounts of external data with AI. This also includes customer name searches for matches, trends, and relationships.
AI then assists businesses in prioritizing and categorizing information to improve risk management.
AI helps with suspicious activity reporting (SAR). AI creates and files reports with appropriate data. SARs go through an internal reporting procedure. These include contributions from the staff before submission to the authorities. The internal process may need data submissions from all over the world and in a variety of languages.
Artificial intelligence simplifies the SAR process. AI can pre-populate automated reports with important data. It then presents the data in an understandable, standardized language and vocabulary. This reduces bureaucratic friction and ensuring consistency for all contributors. AI improves the speed and efficiency of AML reporting.
AI automation in an AML system adds speed and efficiency to compliance procedures. These procedures are difficult and time-consuming.
One of the greatest roadblocks to compliance efficiency is the level of noise. False positives is another name for noise. Inadequate data and over-sensitivity of AML procedures cause this noise.
Due to false positives, very few AML warnings become full SARs. This results in a significant amount of wasted time, money, and resources. AI and machine learning systems have the potential to reduce the amount of noise in the AML process.
AI can assist businesses in gaining a deeper understanding of their consumers. This allows cutting ineffective and irrelevant warnings that make the process so expensive. Those uses, in practice, include:
• Analysis of alerts using semantics to identify those caused by redundant data.
• There can be a Statistical Analysis of high-risk consumers and transactions.
• During sanctions there is use of Intuitive screening, PEP, and unfavorable media screenings.
• Higher-risk consumers get focused on priority during the transaction monitoring process
For ML processes, data quality and administration have always been a concern. Data collection and management need the processing of large amounts of complicated data. For the adoption of next-gen tech, data management continues to be a major challenge:
• The building of consumer profiles gets hampered by redundant data and back-end systems.
• Data from many management systems must get integrated, cleaned, and deduplicated. This has to happen to get a 360-degree perspective of customers.
• Poor quality data makes resolving entities, detecting relationships, and assessing client risks difficult.
• Finding data, such as beneficial owner data, foreign KYC info, etc, is a challenge. Specialized data providers have sprung up to help with some of these issues.
• Data protection laws prohibit the use of personal data for purposes of getting to know a client. These rules need adjustments to fit the framework of the anti-money laundering effort.
Next-generation technology needs large amounts of data processing and storage. In KYC/AML, the Analysis of unstructured data entails the processing of huge volumes of data.
Developing unique, turnkey solutions necessitates expensive technology and data processing capabilities. Such huge investments are out of reach for the enterprises concerned.
Risk-averse financial institutions, particularly compliance departments, are common. There are reasons to be wary of entrusting sensitive client and KYC data to cloud services. Financial institutions will use next-generation approaches if data security issues get addressed. Successful experiences must get multiplied, and regulators must get habituated to AI tech.
The use of AI, machine learning, robotics in KYC and AML systems is still in its early stages. These technologies have proven their capacity to increase efficiency and output. There are still limitations to what they can do.
The growing interaction between AI and financial crime compliance needs human AML teams. The development of risk-based AML programmes tailored to their individual surroundings is necessary.
AI and machine learning techniques reduce noise. They allow AML workers to better respond to critical money laundering warnings. Using human experience and skill contributes more to the fight against financial crime.
You may like to read:
5 Use Cases of RPA in Financial Services